Constructing Ethics: Bioart's Critical Probe into Life Manipulation and Navigating the Ethical Terrain

Authors

  • Ekaterina Dmitrievna Popova Department of Art Theory and Practice, Moscow State Academic Art Institute, Timiryazevskaya Ulitsa, 30, Moscow, 127994, Russia Author
  • Olga Pavlovna Sokolova Department of Art Theory and Practice, Moscow State Academic Art Institute, Timiryazevskaya Ulitsa, 30, Moscow, 127994, Russia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/15d68h89

Keywords:

Bioart, Art and Ethics, Biotechnology, Transgenic Art, Bioethics, Artistic Research, Biological Aesthetics

Abstract

Bioart, a contemporary artistic practice that utilizes biological materials, living tissues, and scientific processes as its medium, stands at the provocative intersection of art, science, and philosophy. By transforming laboratories into studios and biological life into aesthetic material, bioart challenges fundamental conceptions of life, creation, and the role of the artist. However, this very act of aestheticizing life forces a confrontation with a complex and often contentious ethical landscape. This paper argues that bioart does not merely encounter ethical boundaries but actively constructs and probes them, functioning as a vital public forum for debating the implications of biotechnology. Through a critical analysis of seminal bioartworks-from the transgenic aesthetics of Eduardo Kac’s GFP Bunny to the tissue-cultured semi-living of the Tissue Culture & Art Project-this article maps the primary ethical territories contested by the field: the moral status of the manipulated organism, the concepts of agency and authorship, the implications of public engagement, and the biopolitical dimensions of life manipulation. The paper concludes that the ethical unease provoked by bioart is not a flaw to be mitigated but its core critical function, making it an indispensable practice for a society increasingly governed by biological engineering.

References

[1]Joanna Walewska; The Art of Computing as Frieder Nake’s Response to the Problem of “Mechanized Mental Labor”: The Early Debates Revisited. Leonardo 2019; 52 (1): 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01345

[2]Hannelie Warrington-Coetzee; Abstract of: The Theory of Non-Theory: Mindful Art Walks and Healthier Futures. Leonardo 2021; 54 (5): 560. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02075

[3]Amy Ione; Darwin's Camera: Art and Photography in the Theory of Evolution by Phillip Prodger. Oxford University Press, 2009. 320 pp., illus. Hardcover. ISBN-10: 0195150317; ISBN-13: 978-0195150315. Leonardo 2011; 44 (1): 78-80. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_r_00151

[4]Dhruba Deb; Understanding the Unpredictability of Cancer using Chaos Theory and Modern Art Techniques. Leonardo 2016; 49 (1): 66-67. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01099

[5]Michael R. (Mike) Mosher; Film and Authorship; The Visual Turn: Classical Film Theory and Art History. Leonardo 2004; 37 (2): 164. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2004.37.2.164

[6]Massimo Negrotti; From the Artificial to the Art: A Short Introduction to a Theory and Its Applications. Leonardo 1999; 32 (3): 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1162/002409499553217

[7]Alan Marsden; New Prospects for Information Theory in Arts Research. Leonardo 2020; 53 (3): 274-280. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01860

[8]Sean Cubitt; Telematic Embrace: Visionary Theories of Art, Technology, and Consciousness. Leonardo 2004; 37 (2): 160-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2004.37.2.160

[9]Slavko Kacunko; M.A.D.: Media Art Database(s) and the Challenges of Taste, Evaluation and Appraisal. Leonardo 2009; 42 (3): 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2009.42.3.245

[10]Gordon Monro; Emergence and Generative Art. Leonardo 2009; 42 (5): 476-477. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2009.42.5.476

Downloads

Published

2025-11-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ekaterina Dmitrievna Popova, & Olga Pavlovna Sokolova. (2025). Constructing Ethics: Bioart’s Critical Probe into Life Manipulation and Navigating the Ethical Terrain. Art and Theory, 1(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.64229/15d68h89